Case study · Life Science Connect
How Life Science Connect got its editors posting on LinkedIn.
A four-week employee advocacy pilot across three brands: the problem, what we built, and what it produced. April to August 2026.
Jim PomagerVP, Community Success
Matt PillarVP, Editorial and Content
Influent / Life Science Connect02
The problem
LinkedIn was not reaching the people sponsors pay for
Life Science Connect is a B2B publisher with 15 brands. In April 2026 it used LinkedIn to promote events, and nobody could tell whether the right people were seeing any of it.
- 15
- brands, each with its own LinkedIn page and its own editors
- 350
- events a year to promote, which filled every page's calendar
- 2
- automation tools sending connection requests and DMs from editor and sales accounts
What was happening on LinkedIn
The brand pages posted an event a day with a registration link. Editors posted links to their own articles. The audience development team sent cold DMs at volume to hit registration targets, and some accounts were getting warnings from LinkedIn.
Reach was flat. Nobody could say whether the people sponsors pay to reach, the manufacturing, quality and regulatory leaders at pharma and biotech companies, were seeing any of it.
What LSC wanted: one LinkedIn model that works for all 15 brands and shows whether the right people are engaging.
Source: Influent's interviews with LSC's audience development and editorial teams, April 2026.
Influent / Life Science Connect03
The opportunity
The editors already had the audience
LSC's editors are known by name to the people sponsors pay to reach, and most of them have more followers than the brand pages they write for. Nobody had asked them to post as themselves.
Erin HarrisChief Editor, Cell & Gene · 21,300 connections
Jon O’ConnellExecutive Editor, Cell & Gene · 3,700 connections
Louis GarguiloChief Editor, Outsourced Pharma · 14,800 connections
Jeffrey BuguliskisDeputy Chief Editor, Outsourced Pharma · 4,300 connections
Anna Rose WelchEditorial Director, Advancing RNA · 9,800 connections
Michael SolowayAcquisition Editor, Advancing RNA · 3,000 connections
The bet: LinkedIn gives people more reach than company pages. If the editors wrote posts with strong hooks, they would reach more of the right people than the pages ever had. So the pilot put the editors in front and the pages behind them.
Three of 15 brands were chosen for the pilot: Cell & Gene, Outsourced Pharma and Advancing RNA. Connection counts from LinkedIn, November 2026.
Influent / Life Science Connect04
Our solution
Train the editors to post, then measure who engages
Influent did not write the posts. The editors did. We built the plan, taught them how to write a hook, and tracked who engaged.
- 01
Diagnose
We reviewed every brand page, editor profile and DM campaign, and interviewed both teams. April.
- 02
Design
A playbook for each brand, an ICP for each brand loaded into Fluentcy, and a guide to post types. May.
- 03
Teach
Two kickoff sessions and a written guide. The main lesson: spend most of your time on the hook, and lead with the takeaway, not the link. June.
- 04
Coach
Weekly themes in a shared Slack channel, feedback on hooks during the pilot, and a walkthrough of who was engaging in week four. July.
What we asked of each editor
Four posts a week for four weeks, written by the editors themselves and scheduled in Ordinal, on top of their normal workload. They delivered 80 of the 96.
Four-phase engagement, April 6 to August 6, 2026. Pilot posts June 29 to July 26.
Influent / Life Science Connect05
The results
What four weeks produced
- 269
- ICP engagements across the three brands
- 114K
- impressions on 161 posts
- 2 to 3x
- LinkedIn traffic to the websites in two of the three brands
- 174
- people in the ICP engaged, at companies like Sanofi, AstraZeneca, BMS and Lilly
- 1.7x
- editor posts earned 1.7 times the ICP engagement per impression of brand page posts
- 71%
- of editor posts reached at least one person in the ICP
June 29 to July 26, 2026. Measured in Fluentcy and Ordinal. Website traffic from LSC's own analytics.
Influent / Life Science Connect06
The results
Editor posts beat brand page posts
76%
of ICP engagement came from editor posts. Editors wrote half the posts.
2.7
ICP engagements per 1,000 impressions on editor posts, against 1.6 on brand page posts.
Posts · Six editors
80
Posts · Three brand pages
81
Impressions · Six editors
77,857
Impressions · Three brand pages
36,248
ICP engagements · Six editors
210
ICP engagements · Three brand pages
59
Source: Influent's pilot analysis, June 29 to July 26, 2026.
Influent / Life Science Connect07
Why it worked
The hook made the difference
Two posts by the same editor, one day apart. The only difference is the hook. Across all 80 editor posts, hooks that challenged what the reader believed earned 5.5 ICP engagements per post. Hooks that described the topic earned 0.8, at the same reach.

- 931
- impressions
- 1
- ICP engagement
- July 13
- hook describes the topic

- 5,568
- impressions
- 25
- ICP engagements
- July 14
- hook challenges a belief
Screenshots from LinkedIn. Both posts linked to a Cell & Gene article.
Influent / Life Science Connect08
Why it worked
Every editor had a post that worked
The eight best posts came from four editors across all three brands.
Erin Harris · Cell & GeneWrote the best post of the pilot: 5,568 impressions and 25 ICP engagements.
Jon O’Connell · Cell & GeneMost commented post of the pilot, and the most repeat engagement from the same people.
Louis Garguilo · Outsourced PharmaHighest reach of any editor, and the most forwarded post of the pilot with 18 sends.
Jeffrey Buguliskis · Outsourced PharmaSmallest audience, best fit. Everyone in the ICP who engaged with him was a director or above.
Anna Rose Welch · Advancing RNAThe most consistent editor. Her typical post earned three ICP engagements.
Michael Soloway · Advancing RNAThe most saved post of the pilot, with 8 saves and 13 ICP engagements.
Advancing RNA was the most efficient brand: 52 companies reached from 30 editor posts.
Source: Influent's pilot analysis. Headshots from LinkedIn.
Influent / Life Science Connect09
What the client said
What LSC's leadership said
“Our referral traffic from LinkedIn to the website was easily double, maybe triple, for the month.”
Matt PillarVP, Editorial and Content“The biggest takeaway for the editors was: wow, if Erin can do that, if we spend a few more minutes on our posts, I think we can make some measurable progress.”
Matt PillarVP, Editorial and Content“There was a material improvement in follower and connection growth among the pilot editors, even those who aren’t running automated connection campaigns. That was really good to see.”
Matt PillarVP, Editorial and ContentPhase 4 final readout, August 6, 2026. Quotes lightly trimmed for the slide.
Influent / Life Science Connect10
The results
The people who engaged
Manufacturing, quality and regulatory leaders at the companies LSC's sponsors sell to.
People in the ICP who engaged
Stephan Krause, PhDExecutive Director, Cell Therapy Quality, Bristol Myers Squibb
Marianna SabatinoVP Process Sciences, Analytics and Technology, AstraZeneca
Benjamin StevensSenior Director, Regulatory Affairs CMC Policy, Alnylam
Bita BadieiExecutive Director, CMC Regulatory Affairs, Kite Pharma
Zoe ZhengExecutive Director, Pipeline CMC Technical and Strategic Lead, Legend Biotech
John BowenSenior Director, Mixed Modality Operations, Eli Lilly
Samir PanjwaniAssociate Director, External Manufacturing, Cell Therapy, AstraZeneca
Where the 174 people work
- Thermo Fisher Scientific
- AstraZeneca
- Sanofi
- Bristol Myers Squibb
- Eli Lilly
- Legend Biotech
- Kite Pharma
- Biogen
- Astellas Gene Therapies
- AbbVie
- Alnylam
- Lonza
- Genentech
- Novartis
- Pfizer
- Johnson & Johnson
- GSK
- Amgen
- Takeda
- Catalent
- Arcellx
- Cartesian Therapeutics
- Codexis
- Aspen Neuroscience
- Alliance for mRNA Medicines
Source: Fluentcy, posts published June 29 to July 26, 2026. Titles from LinkedIn.
Influent / Life Science Connect11
Post examples
The posts that performed best
The posts that reached the most people in the ICP.
Influent / Life Science Connect12
Post examples
The eight best posts
| # | Post | Author | ICP engagements | Impressions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Visible particulates are a manufacturing strategy problem | Erin Harris | 25 | 5,568 |
| 2 | Oligo purification is about molecular behavior, not the method | Michael Soloway | 13 | 3,367 |
| 3 | The Phase 1 manufacturing model decides commercial scale | Erin Harris | 13 | 2,757 |
| 4 | Outsourced Pharma is back in the live events business | Louis Garguilo | 12 | 1,434 |
| 5 | An open question on antibody-oligonucleotide conjugates | Louis Garguilo | 8 | 3,207 |
| 6 | When should a cell therapy developer engage a CDMO? | Outsourced Pharma page | 7 | 540 |
| 7 | Should editing reagents be classified as drug substance? | Jon O’Connell | 6 comments | 2,242 |
| 8 | What six Orangetheory franchises teach about choosing a CDMO | Jeffrey Buguliskis | 10.2 per 1K | 293 |
Source: Influent's pilot analysis.
Influent / Life Science Connect13
Post example 1 · A question people disagree about
The most commented post of the pilot
Jon O’ConnellExecutive Editor, Cell & Gene · July 21, 2026In week two we asked editors to end posts with a question. Seven tried it and six got no replies. This one got six comments because the question is about something the industry is actually arguing over: whether editing reagents should be classified as drug substance. The head of a cell therapy program pushed back in the thread and another editor answered him.
Comments on editor posts doubled from the first two weeks to the last two, from 17 to 34.
- 6
- comments
- 2,242
- impressions
- 2.36
- engagements per person on Jon's posts, the most of any editor
- 2x
- comments on editor posts in weeks 3 and 4

Screenshot from LinkedIn. Metrics from Influent's pilot analysis.
Influent / Life Science Connect14
Post example 2 · An unexpected way into a technical subject
The best ratio of ICP engagement to impressions
Jeffrey BuguliskisDeputy Chief Editor, Outsourced Pharma · July 1, 2026This post shares a contributor’s article, but the hook is the contributor’s background: he built six Orangetheory franchises before moving into supplier management for cell therapy. The reader cannot guess where it is going, and the person turns out to be an expert.
Everyone in the ICP who engaged with Jeffrey during the pilot was a director or above. The format is easy to repeat. Every editor knows people who took an unusual route into the industry.
- 10.2
- ICP engagements per 1,000 impressions
- 293
- impressions
- 3
- ICP engagements
- 100%
- of the ICP who engaged were director or above

Screenshot from LinkedIn. Metrics from Influent's pilot analysis.
Influent / Life Science Connect15
Post example 3 · Technical depth with a point of view
The most saved post of the pilot
Michael SolowayAcquisition Editor, Advancing RNA · July 13, 2026This post shares a contributor article, but the hook is the article’s argument: the purification method matters less than understanding how the molecule behaves. Eight people saved it to come back to, and the article’s authors added to the thread.
Advancing RNA reached 52 companies in four weeks, the most of the three brands.
- 13
- ICP engagements
- 3,367
- impressions
- 8
- saves
- 36
- reactions

Screenshot from LinkedIn. Metrics from Influent's pilot analysis.
Influent / Life Science Connect16
Our recommendations
Three things we told LSC to stop
Three findings cost LSC something it was used to. One cost us.
Cold DMs at volume
Expecting brand pages to reach the ICP
Paying for our software
Source: Influent's pilot analysis and tool recommendations, August 2026.
Influent / Life Science Connect17
The handoff
What LSC received to run it without us
LSC wanted a model it could run across 15 brands without us. The pilot proved it on three. The handoff package covers the rest.
The verdict
The playbook
The stack
The three changes with the most upside
Fix the hooks first. Have editors write their own view instead of summarizing the article. Give someone the job of resharing editor posts.
Phase 4 documentation package, delivered August 6, 2026.
